If SQL Server tables contained on a Server computer are used as linked table
s
in an Access database on a client computer via ODBC, and action queries
written in Access are run with Access specific functions and references to
controls on Access forms, is the processing done on the Server or the Client
?
Do you still run the risk of corrupting the "back-end" database if a write
operation is interrupted if you use tables in SQL Server database as linked
tables instead of using tables in an Access database as linked tables?> If SQL Server tables contained on a Server computer are used as linked
tables
> in an Access database on a client computer via ODBC, and action queries
> written in Access are run with Access specific functions and references to
> controls on Access forms, is the processing done on the Server or the Client?[/vbc
ol]
The processing works on the client. If your filter is written without
functions, the records to change will be gathered based on your filter. But
the routine actually executes one line at a time from the client.
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Do you still run the risk of corrupting the "back-end" database if a writ
e
> operation is interrupted if you use tables in SQL Server database as linke
d
> tables instead of using tables in an Access database as linked tables?
The transaction won't commit until the action query completes. If the
machine goes down then the transaction will rollback.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment